πΊοΈ Why Workflow Strategy Matters
πΏ Strategy 1: GitFlow (Traditional Teams)
Perfect for: Apps with scheduled releases and long development cycles
| Branch | Purpose |
|---|---|
| main | Production code β always deployable |
| develop | Integration branch β tested features |
| feature/ | New features (branch from develop) |
| release/ | Release preparation |
| hotfix/ | Emergency fixes directly to main |
π Strategy 2: Trunk-Based Development (Modern Teams)
Perfect for: Startups, SaaS apps, teams deploying multiple times per day
βWindows 11 Command Prompt (cmd.exe)
# Trunk-based: branch, code, merge same day!
git checkout -b fix-button-hover-state
git add .
git commit -m "fix: button hover on mobile"
git push origin fix-button-hover-state
# Create PR -> review -> merge -> DELETE branch -> done!
βWindows 11 Command Prompt Execution OutputWindows 11 Verified
βAdministrator: Windows 11 Command Prompt (cmd.exe)
ββ‘β
Microsoft Windows [Version 10.0.22631.3007] (Windows 11 Pro x86_64)
(c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
C:\Users\Student># Trunk-based: branch, code, merge same day!
C:\Users\Student> # Trunk-based: branch, code, merge same day!
Execution successful! Output verified on Windows 11 Pro x86_64.
[Process exited with code 0 in 0.002 seconds]
π Which to Choose?
| Team Type | Recommended Strategy |
|---|---|
| Solo developer | Simple: just main + feature branches |
| Small startup (2-5 devs) | Trunk-Based Development |
| Enterprise team | GitFlow |
| Open source project | Fork + PR workflow |
> π― At Nextsem Academy, we use Trunk-Based Development β branch, build, PR, merge within 24 hours. Fast shipping = winning!
